Is Bolivia One Step Closer to Becoming a Maritime Power?

Bolivian President Evo Morales traveled to Peru yesterday to meet with his Peruvian counterpart President Ollanta Humala.  Bolivia’s access to the Port of Ilo and surrounding territory and the expansion of port facilities were presumably key issues to be discussed. In 1992 then Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori offered Bolivia access to this territory with a 99-year, potentially renewable lease. The understanding was that Bolivia would cover the cost of building the requisite infrastructure. Though the treaty was never ratified its status was of relatively little importance as La Paz lacked the funds to invest in the project. In recent years the Bolivian economy has improved to such a degree that it has the capital which it lacked in the past. For this reason the implementation of the agreement is a key geopolitical imperative for La Paz as it would functionally change Bolivia from a landlocked country to a maritime power.

Bolivia has been fairly successful in recent years. The country’s economy grew an estimated 6.5% in 2013, the budget is balanced, inflation is under control, and debts are manageable. Though the country's success has been aided by the high price of commodities in recent years and thus is subject to market fluctuations (it is already estimated that 2014’s growth will be lower than in 2013) the fact that La Paz has foreign reserves worth an estimated $14 Billion gives the country room to maneuver. Such a nest egg could help fund the expansions of Ilo’s port. Bolivia is also attempting to reduce its dependency on primary commodities. In August 2013 Bolivia and the Netherlands signed a letter of intent in which they agreed to cooperate in developing Bolivia’s substantial lithium deposits to manufacture batteries in Bolivian territory. Though a letter of intent is not a firm agreement, access to adequate port facilities would make Bolivian batteries more competitive thus the development of Ilo could help to transform this letter of intent into a legally binding document. The development of the port could also afford Bolivia the opportunity to set up Export Processing Zones and profit from the types of manufacturing that has helped countries, such as China, develop. Linking the port to the Interoceanic Highway (which connects Brazil to Peru) would also help Bolivia further expand its manufacturing industry and make the country’s exports more competitive.

Access to the sea has long been a contentious issue in Bolivia. The 1879-84 War of the Pacific saw a victorious Chile seizing Bolivia's coastal territory. Bolivia has long sought to address this issue. In April 2013 Bolivia filed a case against Chile with the International Court of Justice. Despite Peru's success in reclaiming land from Chile last month we must note that the cases are different so Peru’s victory is not a precedent which will see Bolivia reclaiming the territory that it lost during the war. Access to Ilo mitigates this issue. No matter what happens the combination of access to adequate port facilities, a well managed economy, developing infrastructure, positive growth, and valuable resources will go a long way towards restoring the investor confidence which Bolivia lost in 2006 when President Morales put the country’s energy sector under state control. Many investors are pulling out of emerging markets for a variety of reasons such as tapering. Exiting emerging markets without taking the time to differentiate between them is short sighted and could stop investors from putting their money in a place where it could contribute to economic development and provide impressive returns. Bolivia may very well be one of these places.
 

Will Improvements in Brazilian Infrastructure Marginalize Argentina?

Argentina is a country that is relatively poor due to policy rather than a lack of resources and easy access to global markets. Though the 2015 presidential election could bring an administration with more pro business policies to power it is important to note that such a shift will not necessarily result in a major influx of capital as issues related to the development of infrastructure could still hinder the country’s development. Infrastructure and investment go hand in hand as capital is less likely to flow into countries that lack adequate facilities. The 2001-2002 Argentine default and the seizure of Repsol’s majority stake in YPF (a settlement may have been reached but a precedent has also been set) will also make investors wary of financing construction. This is not to say that there will be no investment. After all there is some foreign investment aimed at developing the Vaca Muerta shale reserves and Argentina’s hydropower resources. The reality though is that risk increases the cost of capital so the projects that do get funded will likely be on terms that are less favorable to the Argentines than they otherwise would be thus reducing the total funds that can be put towards development.

Improved infrastructure in other parts of the Americas could make Argentine exports less competitive. Argentina is the third largest soy producer in the world after the Brazil and the United States. The expansion of the Panama Canal could make the later two exporters more competitive when shipping soybeans to Asian markets. In addition to this Brazil is attempting to invest $27 billion to improve its infrastructure with the goal of quadrupling Brazilian exports by 2030. Brazil became the largest exporter of soy in 2013 despite its poor infrastructure. Projects such as the development of the Amazonian port of Santarem would make the country even more competitive. Though Brazil has its own share of political and economic issues we have seen that auctions privatizing Brazilian highways, airports and ports are proving to be fairly effective in attracting capital to the country. If Brazil continues to develop and Argentina continues to stagnate it will be difficult for the later to develop infrastructure that is competitive with Brazil. The Argentines could find themselves in a position where they might have to ship some of their goods via Brazilian ports. This would eat into Argentina's profits resulting in less capital for the country to invest in itself.

To truly develop countries have to move beyond being exporters of raw commodities whose prices fluctuate dramatically. Such as shift requires investment and the development of infrastructure such as power plants, adequate port facilities, and internal transport network. Funding such projects is challenging given Argentina’s track record and economic policies. As we have seen competition and the need to rely on foreign ports could further weaken the country and limit the amounts of capital that it can bring to develop its infrastructure. This vicious cycle is a situation that will need to be monitored closely. The increasing demand for agricultural commodities and Argentina’s geographic location will allow it to profit from its resources. That said, a country profiting off of its resources and a country developing to its full potential is not the same thing.

Will November Be a Transformational Month for Myanmar?

November could be an interesting month for Myanmar. This week, representatives from 18 armed, ethnic groups met at the Kachin Independence Organization’s headquarters in the northern town of Laiza to discuss entering into ceasefire negotiations with the government. If peace talks with the government commence, companies that have been wary of investing in the country might reconsider their positions. Signs that an agreement can be reached would be well timed, as they would come during a month when the country is hosting the Myanmar Port Development Forum and the Myanmar Mining Forum. Forums on agribusiness and investing in the country were held in October. Clearly, Naypyidaw is actively courting investors. Though Myanmar has a great deal of mineral wealth, it lacks the infrastructure to exploit it in an efficient manner. A ceasefire agreement combined with the proposed overhaul to the country’s 1994 mining law has the potential to attract investors who are willing to make the long-term commitments necessary to recoup investments in infrastructure.

Under Myanmar’s current mining law the Ministry of Mines serves as a non-equity partner yet it demands approximately 30% of minerals extracted as well as income tax and royalties. In addition to these terms, mining companies are currently responsible for compensating the occupiers of land despite the reality that there is no guide as to what the compensation should be. If reforms to the mining laws are passed and a guideline for compensation is established then the incentive to invest will increase, especially if political instability in the country decreases due to a ceasefire agreement. It is important to note that compensation for land is a difficult subject and it is likely that many people will not receive the compensation that they feel they are owed. This is unfortunate on a humanitarian level and it could contribute to instability in the country on a political and economic level. That said, disturbances from unarmed or poorly armed groups are not nearly as disruptive as the potential for violence posed by heavily armed ethnic militias.

Myanmar is not poor due to a lack of resources or geographic reasons such as being landlocked. The country is underdeveloped due to the decades of political oppression that is now beginning to dissipate. Myanmar has the resources to attract investors and an advantageous, geographic location that can help it to develop quickly. Reforms in the country will see it attain the level of development that its geographic location and resource base affords it. The question is how long this process will take. Trust needs to be built between a variety of factions. This takes time. That said, the process has begun. If a credible ceasefire agreement is reached and if the 1994 mining law is overhauled we could see a great deal of activity in Myanmar which would have a significant effect on trade in the Indian Ocean and economic development in the Asia Pacific region. November has the potential to be the start of this shift.